Green Bay Packers created a lot after the season when they proposed to ban the Philadelphia EaglesThe very successful “TUSH-PUSH” game. The controversial game was back in the news after Philadelphia’s victory over the Washington Commanders In the NFC championship match. Washington tried to timed the SNAP, which led the second Frankie Luvu on several occasions, and the officiating crew threatened to attribute a touch to the Eagles if that happened.
The meetings of the NFL owners took place this week in Florida, with owners, directors general and chief coaches of the 32 teams present. The meetings were also the time for the NFL competition committee to hear new proposals for team rules, including Green Bay’s proposal to ban “Tash-Push”.
Advertisement
There was a lot of support for the ban on the play, but that remains – for now. The competition committee agreed to file the question until the May League meeting, which was a temporary victory for the Eagles. At least 16 teams support the prohibition, but 24 votes are necessary for all rules of rules to be adopted. Several teams were frank on the “tash-push”, believing that if you do not like the game, you have to stop it, while others used the safety of players as well as the ban on the game.
Since his team was strongly affected by the play, what are the thoughts of the head coach Dan Quinn on the game?
On three occasions, Quinn was questioned about the “Tash-Push”. Each time, Quinn’s response was similar; He was more worried to stop the game. He didn’t say if he thought he should be prohibited. Managing Director Adam Peters echoes a similar feeling.
Here is quinn:
Quinn said he knew that the NFL could assign a score in this situation, but the commanders are fighters, and whether it is the first game of the game or the last game, Washington will concede nothing.
Advertisement
Quinn and Peters managed it perfectly. If a team would benefit from the ban on “tash-push”, they are the commanders. But what do they win by publicly guaranteeing that the part is prohibited? Can you imagine the story if the play was prohibited and that the Eagles, their fans and the media of Philadelphia would say that Washington was afraid. By saying nothing in any case, it does not give anyone a point of discussion, and the commanders are back to square one, by finding a way to stop the game.
Dallas’ cowboys went against the “tash-push”, admitting that they would vote for the ban. Commanders were intelligent. No one knows their intentions, and it’s better that way.
This article originally appeared on Wire commanders: Commanders do not reveal reflections on ‘Push’ eagles
